Wot Analysis Of The Environmental Agency Of Bengkulu City In Waste Management In Bengkulu City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70963/jm.v2i2.374Keywords:
SWOT Analysis, Waste Management, Environmental AgencyAbstract
This study aims to analyze the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) in waste management conducted by the Environmental Agency (DLH) of Bengkulu City. The research employed a descriptive qualitative method with data collection techniques including interviews, observations, and documentation. The findings reveal that DLH’s strengths lie in clear regulations, strong support from the local government, and innovative programs such as waste banks and community clean-up activities. However, weaknesses include limited funding, low public awareness, and insufficient use of technology. Opportunities are seen in community participation and collaboration with the private sector, while threats involve the continuously increasing volume of waste and the lack of modern processing facilities. The SWOT analysis indicates that strategies should focus on maximizing community collaboration supported by existing regulations, enhancing environmental education and outreach, and strengthening waste management infrastructure to achieve more effective and sustainable practices.
Downloads
References
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Barrow, C. J. (2006). Environmental management for sustainable development (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. (1992). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: Wiley.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2003). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Fitriani, R. (2020). Peran bank sampah dalam meningkatkan kesadaran lingkungan masyarakat perkotaan. Jurnal Pengelolaan Lingkungan, 8(2), 101–112.
KLHK. (2022). Statistik persampahan Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Rangkuti, F. (2016). Analisis SWOT: Teknik membedah kasus bisnis. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Spradley, J. P. (1997). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tchobanoglous, G., Theisen, H., & Vigil, S. (2002). Integrated solid waste management: Engineering principles and management issues (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
World Bank. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/30317
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fadillah Oktanindya, Evi Lorita , Antonio Imanda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
